German man told to pay child support to ex-wife over secret IVF child

Ex-husband is ordered to pay child support after his former wife forged his signature to undergo IVF treatment using his frozen sperm

  • Karl, 37, and Inge, 42, from Munich, froze fertilised eggs while they were married
  • Couple planned to use the embryos to have children later in life, but got divorced
  • Inge then forged Karl’s signature twice in order to undergo IVF, and had a boy
  • Karl has been told he must pay child support, despite not knowing of the birth

A German man has been told he must pay child support to his ex-wife after she forged his signature in order to have a child with frozen embryos that he fertilised.

Karl, 37, and Inge, 42, created the embryos using her eggs and his sperm while they were married, then had them frozen so they could have children later in life.

The pair then got divorced but unbeknownst to Karl, Inge went back to the fertility clinic in order to undergo IVF treatment.

Karl, 37, and Inge, 42, used their eggs and sperm to create embryos while they were married which were then frozen to allow them to have children later in life

Inge forged his signature twice in order to get access to the embryos before giving birth to a boy, German news channel DW reported.

After the birth, Karl became legally obliged to pay for child support despite not consenting to the pregnancy.

He launched a lawsuit at Munich’s medical malpractice court in order to get out of the payments, saying the clinic should pay instead.

But judges ruled otherwise on Wednesday, saying he had not been clear enough with the clinic when he called to revoke his permission for the embryos to be used.

After the pair got divorced Inge forged her husband’s signature twice in order to give birth to a baby boy via IVF, and Karl has now been told he must pay child support

Staff at the clinic also had no reason to doubt the authenticity of the signatures and so could not be liable, the judges added.

The decision is not legally binding, according to DW. It is not clear if Karl plans to appeal the ruling. 

German courts do not typically give the surnames of people involved in cases for privacy reasons.

Source: Read Full Article